Steven Price

Guide to NZ Media Law

Official Information Act

Official Information Act


Bill of Rights Act

Media law resources

Feeds (RSS)

Author Archive « Previous Entries Next Entries »

Flashbacks

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

A few of these posts might be familiar to those who have subscribed to the discussion group NZMLJ. From time to time, I’ll reproduce some posts of interest from the archives.

How the Clean Slate Act applies to the media

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

The Clean Slate Act effectively expunges people’s old, minor criminal offences. But does that mean the media can’t publish them? Reading the Act as a whole, it looks like it doesn’t. Yes, it’s an offence for a journalist to ask someone to disregard the Act, which allows people to lie about particular convictions if they […]

Who needs the BSA?

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

This might surprise you. I was looking at broadcast licences the other day. As you might guess, they can be subject to conditions, and most of the ones that are imposed relate to technical issues: making sure there’s no overlapping use of the spectrum, for example. Mostly, they’re nothing to do with the content of […]

Chatham House Rule

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

There is only one Chatham House Rule, and this is it: When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed. Note that it allows quoting, […]

Free speech log

Monday, May 12th, 2008

Some upcoming free speech cases: Electoral Finance Act judicial review: strike-out application to be heard on 15 May. Applicants John Boscawen, Garth McVicar, Rodney Hide, and Graham Stairmand now want the court to rule that the Attorney-General should have advised Parliament that the Electoral Finance Bill was inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act, and […]

Okay, have at me

Sunday, May 11th, 2008

This blog is mostly about free speech. It should be becoming clear that my philosophy is that freedom of expression is extremely important and that any limits on it should be carefully defined and properly justified. That philosophy tracks closely with the framework of the Bill of Rights Act, which is relevant to almost all […]

Get over it!

Sunday, May 11th, 2008

Some people think flag-burning is offensive. Fine.  Some argue that it’s not speech. Not so fine. One of them, somewhat extraordinarily, is Stephen Franks: The effect of flag-burning derives solely from its power to shock and offend. It is not speech; it is not expression. It is the suppression and destruction of others’ expression. As […]

JK Rowling and the Chamber of Secrets

Sunday, May 11th, 2008

Actually, it’s not a chamber that she’s looking to keep secret. It’s a photograph on the open street. She’s sued over the publication of some paparazzi photos of her and her husband on a street pushing a baby buggy containing David, their 19-month old baby. And the UK Court of Appeal has just ruled that they […]

Judicial smack-down on cameras in courts

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

Memo from Justice Fogarty to almost every other judge in the country: You are breaking the law. You are riding roughshod over the presumption of innocence. You are punishing defendants before they have been convicted. You are shirking your duty to ensure that witnesses are not inhibited by cameras in court. You are not doing […]

A victory for the Berrymans?

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

You will have heard that Justice Mallon has granted judicial review of the coroner’s ruling in the Berryman’s bridge collapse case. Here are some things you might think you know about the Berryman case from the media coverage: The Berrymans “won” the case The decision said the bridge collapse was “not their fault” The Berrymans […]

« Previous Entries Next Entries »