« My pick for best protest of the year | Main | Nipples of discontent »
What took us so long?
By Steven | September 27, 2013
Great news that NZ has decided to join up to the Open Government Partnership, an international effort to increase government transparency.
It’s a bit odd that our PM made this announcement as a sort of a postscript to a press release about his chummy meeting with UK PM David Cameron – and essentially described our decision to join the Open Government Partnership as a favour to the UK:
At the request of the UK, New Zealand will formally express its intention to join the Open Government Partnership (OGP) later this year.
The UK is the current lead co‑chair of the OGP – a grouping of 58 countries and nine civil society organisations committed to transparent and open government, combatting corruption, and harnessing new technologies.
“The OGP’s goals are consistent with New Zealand values and with our goals for international economic and social development, and I was pleased the UK invited us to join,” Mr Key says.
Yes, thanks UK, for inviting us to join. Except that… we were invited to join a couple of years ago. We’ve been faffing around since then. 54 countries have already joined. It’s not as if it’s exclusive.
Why the delay? After all, our country actually does have a very good track record on transparency. And the National government has already issued its Declaration on Open and Transparent Government, which makes nice noises about actively releasing high value public data.
I suspect it has something to do with the obligations entailed. We’ll have to develop an action plan in consultation with civil society and then assess ourselves against our commitments. Then we’ll have to open ourselves to an independent assessment of our progress. This might involve some cost, and some potential… increases in transparency. I wonder which the government regards as the more problematic?
Might our reluctance also have something to do with embarassment at the government’s recent insulting rejection of nearly all of the Law Commission’s generally very sensible recommendations for improving our official information framework, including subjecting Parliament to the Official Information Act?
Here’s the analysis from MFAT (credit to an OIA request by Andrew Eccleston):
The question of New Zealand’s membership of the OGP is one of weighing the costs of engagement against the risks of domestic and international criticism should New Zealand’s absence become glaring.
Sigh. Is it too much to ask that our officials also factor in the possibility that greater transparency is a good thing for the country all by itself? That it might lead to greater accountability? Maybe even greater public participation? And more effective government? And at least a greater sense of public trust and confidence in government? That our existing law and culture around transparency are not perfect? That we might have something to learn from the sharing of experiences, ideas and evidence of best practices that the OGP facilitates?
Topics: Official Information Act | 45 Comments »
45 Responses to “What took us so long?”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
July 16th, 2020 at 6:12 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 61262 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
July 17th, 2020 at 2:10 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
July 19th, 2020 at 3:17 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 52730 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
July 27th, 2020 at 12:51 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 7615 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
July 29th, 2020 at 3:07 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
August 23rd, 2020 at 3:01 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 8477 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
August 24th, 2020 at 8:14 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
August 24th, 2020 at 10:06 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
August 28th, 2020 at 1:01 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
September 7th, 2020 at 3:07 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
September 23rd, 2020 at 5:40 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
September 27th, 2020 at 11:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
September 29th, 2020 at 9:06 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 96946 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
October 12th, 2020 at 10:44 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
October 14th, 2020 at 3:52 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 76923 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
November 1st, 2020 at 11:33 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
November 5th, 2020 at 4:10 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
November 6th, 2020 at 1:16 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
November 14th, 2020 at 7:28 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 45319 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
November 27th, 2020 at 9:35 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
December 1st, 2020 at 5:09 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
December 11th, 2020 at 11:07 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
December 17th, 2020 at 5:45 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
December 20th, 2020 at 4:42 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
December 21st, 2020 at 1:22 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
December 23rd, 2020 at 2:51 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
January 5th, 2021 at 12:47 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
January 9th, 2021 at 7:53 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
February 11th, 2021 at 9:08 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
February 16th, 2021 at 3:15 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
February 27th, 2021 at 1:02 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
April 3rd, 2021 at 4:30 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
May 14th, 2021 at 11:25 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
May 17th, 2021 at 10:09 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
June 26th, 2021 at 12:55 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 8:42 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 65326 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
July 3rd, 2021 at 1:13 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
July 17th, 2021 at 9:37 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
August 14th, 2021 at 11:20 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
October 20th, 2021 at 1:07 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
December 19th, 2021 at 1:39 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
January 22nd, 2022 at 12:54 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
February 9th, 2022 at 11:59 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
February 9th, 2022 at 1:39 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]
March 31st, 2022 at 11:58 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 29267 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=614 […]