« Law Commission’s new media paper | Main | Confessions of a tabloid journalist »
Public expectations and media standards
By Steven | December 14, 2011
The Law Commission suggests that its proposed independent media regulator consult with the public to establish what their expectations are of journalistic standards, so that these can be reflected in the structures and ethics codes it draws up (see paras 5.93 and 6.95).
Is this really the right question? I rather doubt it. If you’re asking what standards the public expect of the media, new and old, I wouldn’t be surprised if you got some fairly cynical responses.
But I suppose it’s implicit in this that we’re asking them what standards they think the media should be held to. Even then, is this a sensible question? When the BSA conducted a survey about what people’s expectations of privacy and the media were, they discovered that people disagreed wildly about it.
I really wonder whether many people have really thought about it. Do we want journalistic standards to be determined by what a bunch of random people happen to pull out of their heads when someone phones them? Why should we think their answers will be grounded in the realities of news-gathering or forged by the experience of being the subject of news stories? Aren’t we really more interested in what standards people desire after they’re schooled up on the issues?
If that’s the case, why are we going to the public at all? Do we go to the public when we’re setting ethical standards for lawyers or accountants? Consumer standards? I don’t think we do. We consult experts, talk to people engaged in the issues, look at best practice elsewhere, look for evidence and convincing reasoning about what works and best reflects the values we identify as important. In fact, that’s the way the Law Commission goes about its business. At some point it invites public submissions, and generally only gets responses from stakeholders. It doesn’t tend to conduct public surveys about what the law should be.
I’m not saying we shouldn’t seek public feedback. But we shouldn’t expect it to provide any clear answers, and in many cases it probably won’t even provide thoughtful ones. We’ve got a very good idea about what constitutes ethical journalism from the similarity of hundreds of codes of ethics around the world and the experience of veteran journalists. Maybe we need to think harder about exactly which questions we want public feedback on and what information we provide people with first…
Topics: Media ethics | 50 Comments »
50 Responses to “Public expectations and media standards”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
January 27th, 2012 at 9:16 pm
And todya there is the story of the life-guard in the Taranaki who, when asked to confirm a story that a middle aged woman had been sun-bathing topless on her beach, refused to confirm or deny. A statement about her view of journalists and their ethics, I wonder?
June 6th, 2020 at 11:13 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
June 16th, 2020 at 5:30 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
July 27th, 2020 at 6:01 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 53262 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
August 1st, 2020 at 6:11 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 55714 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
August 5th, 2020 at 3:57 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
August 5th, 2020 at 10:25 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
August 10th, 2020 at 6:33 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
August 18th, 2020 at 4:04 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
September 2nd, 2020 at 5:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
September 3rd, 2020 at 3:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
September 5th, 2020 at 12:54 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
September 5th, 2020 at 2:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
September 20th, 2020 at 7:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
September 27th, 2020 at 11:44 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
September 29th, 2020 at 11:29 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
October 30th, 2020 at 3:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
November 7th, 2020 at 2:20 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
November 8th, 2020 at 6:28 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
November 8th, 2020 at 2:02 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
November 14th, 2020 at 8:23 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
November 15th, 2020 at 9:44 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
November 29th, 2020 at 6:04 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 61169 additional Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
December 7th, 2020 at 2:32 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
December 20th, 2020 at 7:01 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
January 7th, 2021 at 1:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
January 15th, 2021 at 8:06 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
January 17th, 2021 at 6:40 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
March 31st, 2021 at 11:27 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
May 20th, 2021 at 3:39 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
June 23rd, 2021 at 3:58 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 22234 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
June 27th, 2021 at 1:10 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 73980 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
June 27th, 2021 at 7:59 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 3088 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
June 29th, 2021 at 3:10 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
July 3rd, 2021 at 12:55 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
July 25th, 2021 at 12:23 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
October 30th, 2021 at 10:14 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
November 8th, 2021 at 12:47 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
December 12th, 2021 at 3:19 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
December 30th, 2021 at 8:13 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 22895 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
January 8th, 2022 at 3:13 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
January 20th, 2022 at 11:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
January 24th, 2022 at 12:43 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
February 1st, 2022 at 12:51 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
March 3rd, 2022 at 1:45 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
March 16th, 2022 at 12:15 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 99986 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
May 1st, 2022 at 12:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
May 7th, 2022 at 11:49 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
May 10th, 2022 at 2:53 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 44388 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]
June 8th, 2022 at 5:44 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=535 […]