Steven Price

Guide to NZ Media Law

Official Information Act

Official Information Act


Bill of Rights Act

Media law resources

Feeds (RSS)


« | Main | »

Marshalling the facts?

By Steven | March 31, 2011

You may recall that I blogged about a student who accused journalist Jonathan Marshall of trying to persuade him to lie to university staff to extract information from them. The Sunday Star-Times’ editor called it “complete fantasy”.

I’ve just had another long conversation with the student concerned. His memory of Jonathan’s approach is detailed. He says it happened after a tutorial at 2:30pm on Friday. He says a tall, lean, brown-haired man approached him as he left a university building. The man was wearing a dark suit without a tie, and was accompanied by another man, who was about 40, with brown hair and stubble. The first man looked familiar. The man introduced himself as “Jonathan from the Sunday Star-Times”. The student now recognises him as Jonathan Marshall.

He says Jonathan struck up a conversation about the Darren Hughes incident and asked him, among other things, where the complainant was likely to have his classes, whether there was a bar on campus, and which bars first-year students hang out in.

At one point, he says, Jonathan asked whether he would be prepared to go to the office and say he was a long-lost friend of the complainant, that he wanted to catch up with him, and find out where his classes were. (He refused, but didn’t say to Jonathan’s face that the idea was “morally bankrupt”: that was something he told me and I wrongly thought he’d said it to Jonathan, so I’ve deleted that from the original post).

The student has no reason to lie that is apparent to me. He says he discussed his experience with his father and flatmates before he told me.  I found him convincing. I note that Jonathan was himself seen in a nearby university office shortly afterward, wearing a dark suit and no tie.

I don’t think it can really be said that there is “nothing to suggest this supposed incident ever took place” or that it is “complete fantasy”. I think there are good reasons to suspect that Marshall did try to encourage a student to lie for him to get information about the complainant for his story.

I might add that, even if it did happen, there is an interesting debate to be had about whether it’s wrong (or always wrong) for journalists to do that sort of thing.

Topics: Media ethics | Comments Off on Marshalling the facts?