« New media law blog | Main | Fair comment defence succeeds »
Burning for reform
By Steven | March 25, 2010
Are republicans the only people in NZ who can commit the offence of flag-burning by burning a flag?
You might remember that Paul Hopkinson had his conviction for flag-burning overturned in the High Court, because Justice Ellen France held that the offence needed to be interpreted narrowly to provide space for free speech rights under the Bill of Rights. She said that the offence requires that the prosecution prove that the defendant intended to vilify the flag. That’s unlikely to be established where a flag is burned as part of a political protest. (That’s one of the reasons that Valerie Morse, the ANZAC day flag-burner, was charged with offensive behaviour rather than the specific offence of destroying or damaging a NZ flag.)
At first blush, that sounds like good news for the Republic of New Zealand Party members who torched a flag on Parliament’s grounds recently, and are under investigation by the police for it. After all, they too were conducting a political protest, at a political venue, and their message was pretty clear. They too were simply using the flag as a vehicle for that protest.
But hang on. There’s quite a good case for saying that, unlike Paul Hopkinson, these guys really did intend to vilify the flag. They were protesting against the flag itself and all it stands for. A Maori sovereignty protester might who lit up a flag might be in a similar position. But anyone else who uses this device to protest any other government policy almost certainly isn’t.
I rather doubt that charges will be laid. The Attorney-General’s consent is required, for one thing. Goes to show, once again, what a silly offence this is. We should repeal it.
Topics: NZ Bill of Rights Act, Protest speech | 49 Comments »
49 Responses to “Burning for reform”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
March 31st, 2010 at 6:42 am
Steven,
I agree that flag burning is a silly offence and the law should be repealed. But presumably that wouldn’t help someone charged with offensive behaviour, as Valerie was.
June 27th, 2020 at 8:05 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 51332 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
July 12th, 2020 at 8:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 40179 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
August 7th, 2020 at 2:47 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 63457 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
August 26th, 2020 at 4:54 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
September 8th, 2020 at 1:48 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
October 11th, 2020 at 11:54 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
October 15th, 2020 at 8:20 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 47885 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
November 1st, 2020 at 6:07 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
November 10th, 2020 at 1:04 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
November 16th, 2020 at 12:36 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
December 20th, 2020 at 7:11 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
December 23rd, 2020 at 12:03 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 23279 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
January 6th, 2021 at 1:23 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
January 21st, 2021 at 8:01 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 9911 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
January 21st, 2021 at 10:34 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
January 22nd, 2021 at 11:59 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
March 28th, 2021 at 12:21 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
May 5th, 2021 at 2:23 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
May 8th, 2021 at 7:41 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
May 18th, 2021 at 6:19 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
June 27th, 2021 at 6:36 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 63483 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 9:51 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
June 29th, 2021 at 12:43 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 53323 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
June 29th, 2021 at 5:24 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 94149 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
July 6th, 2021 at 2:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
August 6th, 2021 at 11:56 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 5708 additional Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
September 1st, 2021 at 8:40 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
September 2nd, 2021 at 10:56 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
September 2nd, 2021 at 11:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
September 6th, 2021 at 12:16 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
October 7th, 2021 at 11:41 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 52403 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
December 4th, 2021 at 11:02 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
December 7th, 2021 at 8:46 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
January 5th, 2022 at 6:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
January 26th, 2022 at 1:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
January 30th, 2022 at 6:32 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
February 23rd, 2022 at 11:29 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
March 4th, 2022 at 10:21 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 74136 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
April 7th, 2022 at 9:09 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
April 13th, 2022 at 10:45 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
April 15th, 2022 at 2:39 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
April 19th, 2022 at 6:32 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
April 19th, 2022 at 9:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
April 26th, 2022 at 12:37 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
June 11th, 2022 at 10:07 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
June 14th, 2022 at 9:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
June 18th, 2022 at 8:44 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]
June 25th, 2022 at 8:20 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 72425 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=355 […]