« TVNZ upholds Paul Henry complaint | Main | A whale of a campaign »
New Canadian responsible journalism defamation defence
By Steven | December 23, 2009
The Canadian Supreme Court has followed most of the rest of the common law world in developing a privilege to publish information in the public interest, providing the publication was “responsible”. Both are elements for the defence to prove. It’s broadly similar to the UK defence in Reynolds – so it’s wider than the current versions of the defence in NZ and Australia.
What’s “responsible journalism”? The SC has set out a series of factors closely resembling Lord Nicholls’ ten factors from Reynolds. Here’s a summary from the headnote:
The judge determines whether the impugned statement relates to a matter of public interest. If public interest is shown, the jury decides whether on the evidence the defence of responsible communication is established. The following factors may aid in determining whether a defamatory communication on a matter of public interest was responsibly made: (a) the seriousness of the allegation; (b) the public importance of the matter; (c) the urgency of the matter; (d) the status and reliability of the source; (e) whether the plaintiff’s side of the story was sought and accurately reported; (f) whether the inclusion of the defamatory statement was justifiable; (g) whether the defamatory statement’s public interest lay in the fact that it was made rather than its truth (“reportage”); and (h) any other relevant circumstances.
Note that they’ve snuck in some a version of neutral reportage – see factor (g) and also paras [119] and [120]. It remains to be seen whether this will require categorisation of articles as reportage or investigative, which has been the suggestion in the UK, where Reynolds applies to investigative journalism, and neutral reportage to non-investigative accounts of important public disputes. Perhaps the Canadian approach is more flexible, and asks more simply whether the degree of care exercised was appropriate in the circumstances…
See also the Cusson case, also hot off the press and to similar effect.
Topics: Defamation, NZ Bill of Rights Act | 47 Comments »
47 Responses to “New Canadian responsible journalism defamation defence”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
May 31st, 2020 at 8:01 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
June 5th, 2020 at 6:53 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
June 6th, 2020 at 4:03 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
June 6th, 2020 at 3:48 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 67491 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
June 25th, 2020 at 11:55 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
July 2nd, 2020 at 3:49 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
July 10th, 2020 at 9:12 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 7361 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
August 1st, 2020 at 5:24 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
August 5th, 2020 at 5:32 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 53859 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
August 23rd, 2020 at 6:52 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
August 24th, 2020 at 5:00 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
September 1st, 2020 at 9:09 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
September 1st, 2020 at 1:43 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
September 7th, 2020 at 5:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
September 11th, 2020 at 11:51 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
September 28th, 2020 at 5:46 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
September 29th, 2020 at 9:17 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 78842 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
October 2nd, 2020 at 6:05 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 5th, 2020 at 3:05 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 8th, 2020 at 2:43 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 9th, 2020 at 12:39 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 16238 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 13th, 2020 at 12:32 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 15th, 2020 at 8:55 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 20th, 2020 at 1:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 23rd, 2020 at 12:54 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 27th, 2020 at 2:01 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 28th, 2020 at 5:28 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 28th, 2020 at 10:43 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
January 15th, 2021 at 7:52 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 3648 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
March 27th, 2021 at 12:53 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
April 7th, 2021 at 2:14 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 91217 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
May 26th, 2021 at 7:28 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
May 26th, 2021 at 11:58 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 9:26 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 7:04 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 75209 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
July 3rd, 2021 at 4:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
July 20th, 2021 at 5:22 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 1791 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
August 9th, 2021 at 12:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
August 10th, 2021 at 10:14 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
September 17th, 2021 at 3:13 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
November 10th, 2021 at 9:36 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
December 11th, 2021 at 6:35 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 94528 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
January 2nd, 2022 at 1:59 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 92637 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
February 7th, 2022 at 12:32 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
March 3rd, 2022 at 2:14 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
May 8th, 2022 at 3:15 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]
May 24th, 2022 at 12:35 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=332 […]