« Just as long as you’re not “impugning Parliament”… | Main | Upcoming seminar on the Internet and suppression issues »
Libel games
By Steven | November 10, 2009
London is known as the libel capital of the world. But I was chatting to Melbourne Law School professor Andrew Kenyon last week, and he said that there is a country whose defamation laws are even more plaintiff-friendly than England’s: Australia.
US-based internet game company Ebony [ooops, it’s Evony, as Russell points out in the comments – I got it right below] seems to be of the same view. It is suing a UK blogger for defamation for criticising it online. It is suing in Australia. Blogger Bruce Everiss has posted the nasty letter on his blog, as well as some prominent links to his criticisms.
How can this be? An Australian High Court decision called Gutnick (the first syllable rhymes with “foot” not “hut”) established that defamation occurs where a publication is downloaded and read, so the Aussie courts have jurisdiction. It doesn’t seem to be contested that the blog has some readers, and the game has some players, in Australia. (I can’t see why the UK courts wouldn’t also have jurisdiction. The same’s also true of the US, but no sensible plaintiff would choose to sue there). It may be that Evony has picked Aussie to make things more awkward for Everiss.
Gutnick provoked much angst and hand-wringing. Everything on the internet is subject to the defamation laws of every country on the planet! Trigger-happy plaintiffs across the globe will flock to the world’s most oppressive legal systems and sue there! This could shut down the internet!
At the time, I doubted this. Still do. For a range of fairly predictable reasons, the rash of lawsuits hasn’t eventuated. Still, libel tourism has always been a problem, and this case may illustrate the continued dangers. Interestingly, the courts in the UK are showing an increasing willingness to reject cases where the publication in the UK is very limited.
Another interesting feature of the case is that Evony is claiming worldwide damages: that is, damages for the harm caused all over the world by Everiss’s blog – not just the harm caused to his reputation among Australian readers. According to Aussie internet law expert Matt Collins, this is a first. The usual practice is for plaintiffs looking to take opportunistic advantage of a favourable jurisdiction is to restrict the claim to reputational damage within the jurisdiction itself. That could be big.
The ABC’s Law Report has a terrific programme on the issues, including interviews with Everiss, Collins, US academic Brian Murchison and Everiss’s Australian lawyer.
Topics: Defamation, Internet issues | 46 Comments »
46 Responses to “Libel games”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
November 10th, 2009 at 11:35 pm
It’s Evony, and I think they’re Chinese-based but using British lawyers.
It’s fair to say these people have a very poor reputation indeed, and that Everiss’s blogs have strongly influenced that reputation.
June 1st, 2020 at 8:11 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
June 16th, 2020 at 2:43 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
June 23rd, 2020 at 2:23 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
June 27th, 2020 at 10:36 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
July 20th, 2020 at 12:24 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 92456 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
August 7th, 2020 at 10:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
August 23rd, 2020 at 9:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
August 31st, 2020 at 1:33 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
September 8th, 2020 at 4:46 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
September 25th, 2020 at 3:11 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
September 29th, 2020 at 12:21 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
September 30th, 2020 at 12:12 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
October 6th, 2020 at 10:09 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
October 9th, 2020 at 8:02 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
October 20th, 2020 at 2:37 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
November 8th, 2020 at 12:35 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
November 17th, 2020 at 5:36 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
November 28th, 2020 at 3:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 56369 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
December 2nd, 2020 at 5:31 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
December 8th, 2020 at 12:53 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
December 11th, 2020 at 3:48 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
December 20th, 2020 at 8:43 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
December 23rd, 2020 at 1:07 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
December 24th, 2020 at 12:50 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 14753 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
January 2nd, 2021 at 12:37 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
January 7th, 2021 at 2:57 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
January 12th, 2021 at 3:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 206 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
January 15th, 2021 at 2:47 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
January 21st, 2021 at 1:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
January 23rd, 2021 at 12:19 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 42119 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
March 14th, 2021 at 1:17 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 50117 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
March 14th, 2021 at 2:49 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 66127 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
March 15th, 2021 at 2:05 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
April 2nd, 2021 at 2:30 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
April 22nd, 2021 at 7:39 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
April 23rd, 2021 at 3:44 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 46113 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
May 2nd, 2021 at 8:44 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
May 8th, 2021 at 2:39 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
May 21st, 2021 at 5:02 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
June 15th, 2021 at 3:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
June 21st, 2021 at 1:46 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
June 27th, 2021 at 10:11 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 4:29 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
July 3rd, 2021 at 1:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]
July 26th, 2021 at 7:19 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=307 […]